The Worse, The Better
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18740/ss27366Keywords:
crisis, revolution, ideology, Lenin, social movementsAbstract
I often hear students say that the reason there's no mass movement for revolution is that things haven't gotten bad enough yet. I argue back, explaining why worse doesn't automatically lead to better. Yet, I must admit, as a political activist, I routinely emphasize the depths of the latest crisis and warn of worse to come. If the path to liberation runs through catastrophe, why do I have such a hard time admitting that? If not, why do we on the Far Left revel in bad news? This essay answers these questions by comparing “the worse, the better” politics as attributed to Lenin with what Lenin actually said and did. I make a case for seeing a crisis as neither wholly good nor wholly bad, but instead as a collection of forces fueling resistance and reaction.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 James Cairns
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright: Authors who publish in the Journal agree to the following terms: 1)Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal; and, 2)Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the Journal's published version of the work (eg post to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal.
